Skip to main content

​
What You’ll Learn

  • How each AI’s writing style differs
  • Which AI to pick for each document type
  • How to experiment with multiple engines
  • When to try a different engine

​
The 5 Writing Styles

​
Claude

Style: Nuanced, well-structured, elegant prose Strengths: Clear logical flow, balanced perspectives, strong narrative Best for: Executive briefs, case studies, analysis, anything that needs to persuade or explain clearly

​
GPT-5.2

Style: Logical, precise, technically rigorous Strengths: Clean formatting, consistent structure, data-driven Best for: Technical specs, comparison tables, dev briefs, anything requiring precision

​
Grok

Style: Direct, conversational, personality-rich Strengths: Engaging hooks, readable prose, cuts through complexity Best for: Blog articles, announcements, anything that needs to feel human and accessible

​
Perplexity

Style: Research-heavy, citation-rich, evidence-based Strengths: Source references, factual grounding, comprehensive data Best for: Research papers, white papers, anything where sources and evidence matter

​
Gemini

Style: Comprehensive, big-picture, synthesizing Strengths: Handles large context, connects themes, thorough coverage Best for: Long reports, white papers, comprehensive analyses, documents from lengthy conversations

​
Recommendations by Document Type

Document TypePrimary PickAlternativeWhy
Research PaperClaudePerplexityNuanced analysis; citations if needed
ComparisonGPT-5.2ClaudeClean tables and consistent criteria
SWOT AnalysisClaudeGPT-5.2Strategic framing with clarity
Competitive AnalysisGPT-5.2ClaudeStructured matrices, precise data
Blog ArticleGrokClaudeEngaging, conversational tone
LinkedIn ArticleClaudeGrokProfessional yet readable
White PaperGeminiClaudeComprehensive, handles depth
Case StudyClaudeGrokNarrative strength
Press ReleaseGPT-5.2ClaudeFollows format precisely
Executive BriefClaudeGPT-5.2Concise strategic framing
Pitch DocumentClaudeGrokPersuasive structure
SOW / ProposalGPT-5.2ClaudePrecise scope and terms
Stakeholder UpdateClaudeAnyClear, professional
AnnouncementGrokClaudeDirect, engaging
Dev Project BriefGPT-5.2ClaudeTechnical precision
Content BriefClaudeGPT-5.2Clear creative direction
TutorialGPT-5.2ClaudeStep-by-step clarity
DistillAny-Speed matters most
Meeting NotesAny-Structure over style
FAQGPT-5.2ClaudeConsistent Q&A format
Decision RecordClaudeGPT-5.2Nuanced rationale
Onboarding DocClaudeGrokWelcoming yet informative

​
The Experiment Approach

Here’s something most users don’t realize: you can generate the same document with different AI engines and compare.
  1. Generate with your first choice
  2. Generate again with a different engine
  3. Compare the outputs
  4. Pick the one that fits your needs (or combine the best parts)
This is especially valuable for high-stakes documents where the writing style matters.

​
When to Try a Different Engine

Switch engines when:
  • The output feels too formal (try Grok)
  • The output lacks depth (try Gemini or Claude)
  • You need more citations (try Perplexity)
  • The structure feels messy (try GPT-5.2)
  • The tone feels robotic (try Grok or Claude)

​
Tips

  • There’s no universally “best” engine. It depends on your document’s purpose and audience.
  • Your preference may differ from the recommendations - experiment to find what works for you.
  • For internal documents where speed matters more than polish, any engine works fine.
  • For client-facing or public documents, spend the extra minute trying 2 engines.

​
Still Need Help?

Reach out to us at [email protected] or use the feedback button in the app.