What You’ll Learn
- How Debate mode works
- What the debate structure looks like
- When it’s the right mode
- How to frame questions for the best debates
How It Works
- You pose a question, statement, or decision
- AIs are assigned different positions (for/against, or multiple viewpoints)
- Each AI argues their assigned position with evidence and logic
- AIs respond to each other’s arguments (rebuttals)
- You see the full debate and decide for yourself
What You See
A structured debate with:- Position statements - Each AI’s initial argument
- Evidence - Data and reasoning supporting each side
- Rebuttals - AIs responding to each other’s points
- Key tensions - Where the fundamental disagreements lie
- Common ground - What both sides agree on (often the most useful insight)
When to Use Debate Mode
| Scenario | Why Debate |
|---|---|
| ”Should we do X?” decisions | See both sides fully argued |
| Controversial topics | Get balanced perspectives |
| Before making big commitments | Stress-test your leaning |
| When you suspect confirmation bias | Force yourself to hear the other side |
| Strategy choices with trade-offs | Understand what you’re giving up |
Example
Your message:FOR: Raise Now (Argued by Grok, GPT-5.2)AGAINST: Wait 6 Months (Argued by Claude, Perplexity)
- Current market conditions favor AI companies - window may not last
- 78% of startups that delay fundraising report worse terms 6 months later
- Your current metrics ($45K MRR, 15% MoM growth) already meet typical Series A benchmarks
- Runway anxiety affects team performance and hiring ability
- Rebuttal to “wait”: The metrics improvement you’re targeting (2x MRR) isn’t guaranteed and may take longer than 6 months
COMMON GROUND Both sides agree:
- Current MRR (100K+ gets significantly better terms
- 6 months of growth at 15% MoM = $105K MRR (more than doubles valuation leverage)
- Fundraising takes 3-4 months - you’d be raising during a stronger position
- Fewer dilution at higher valuation: potentially 5-8% less founder dilution
- Rebuttal to “raise now”: Market timing is unpredictable, but metrics-based valuation is more defensible than momentum-based
KEY TENSION Risk of waiting (market downturn, growth stall) vs. reward of waiting (better terms, less dilution)
- Current metrics are fundable, just not optimal
- Market conditions are favorable but uncertain
- The decision hinges on confidence in sustaining 15% MoM growth
How to Frame Questions for Better Debates
Good Debate Questions
- “Should we build or buy our analytics solution?”
- “Is it better to hire a senior marketer or two junior ones?”
- “Should we expand to Europe now or focus on US market?”
- “Remote-first or hybrid: which is better for our 30-person team?”
Poor Debate Questions
- “What’s 2 + 2?” (no debate to be had)
- “Tell me about marketing” (no clear positions)
- “How do I fix this bug?” (not a debate topic)
Tips
- State your current leaning if you have one: “I’m leaning toward raising now, but change my mind.” This makes the counter-arguments more targeted.
- Follow up on the strongest counter-argument. The point that surprises you most is probably the one worth exploring.
- Use Debate before Red Team. Debate is balanced (both sides). Red Team is adversarial (attacking your idea). Start with Debate for perspective, then Red Team to stress-test.
- Generate a Decision Record after a good debate - it captures the arguments, trade-offs, and your final rationale.
- Don’t treat it as a vote. 3 AIs arguing “for” doesn’t mean it’s the right choice. Evaluate the quality of arguments, not the count.
After the Debate
Once you’ve seen both sides:- Dig deeper on the argument that surprised you: “@Claude, tell me more about the dilution impact you mentioned”
- Ask for a recommendation now that both sides are laid out: “Given everything discussed, what would you actually recommend?”
- Generate a document - Decision Record captures the full reasoning for future reference
Related Articles
- How 5 AIs Work Together
- Sequential Mode: Deep Analysis
- Red Team Mode: Find the Flaws
- Generate a Decision Record

