You ask hard questions, they argue, you win.
Suprmind is a multi-AI chat platform for anyone who wants correct answers and breakthrough ideas from their AIs.
Run five frontier AI models in the same thread. Each one reads and builds on everything before it, so hallucinations and errors get caught before they reach you.
FIVE IS SMARTER THAN ONE.
An ilustrated example how five AIs in the same chat sharpen one answer.
GPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, and Perplexity in one thread. Each reads what came before and builds on it instead of starting fresh.
Sequential, Super Mind, Debate, Red Team, First Principles, and Research Symphony. Pick the thinking pattern that fits the job.
Three preset teams: The A-team, Operators, and Daily Drivers. Suprmind auto-routes each message, or you override anytime.
DCI flags where the AIs disagree, right in the thread. The Adjudicator turns that into a decision brief. DVE stress-tests high-stakes calls before you commit.
Drop a 200-page PDF. Every AI answers from the exact same passages, with citations, so no model drifts from the source.
25+ templates. Two clicks turn any conversation into a research paper, executive brief, or board memo. PDF and DOCX, charts embedded.
A live sidebar that pulls out decisions, risks, and action items as you talk. Project Memory keeps every thread primed with what the others decided.
The AIs draw charts inline: bar, line, heatmap, and table. Multiple per response. Download as PNG or drop straight into a master doc.
Give Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok, and Perplexity each their own instructions inside a project. One panel, five distinct voices.
Switch modes mid-thread without losing context. Red Team your plan, Debate its top risks, Sequential the strategy, then export the executive brief.
Paste a rough brain dump. Prompt Adjutant rewrites it into a structured prompt the AI boardroom performs far better against.
Coming soon. A dual-layer hallucination checker that verifies high-risk claims, numbers, dates, and citations as each model generates them.
Your entry into orchestrated intelligence – where five AI minds collaborate instead of one guessing alone
Experience the consilium
Get 7 Days Free Spark Trial
Conversation Modes
What’s included:
Decision intelligence for serious work
Get Pro
Conversation Modes
What’s included:
Your AI boardroom for professionals
Get Frontier
Conversation Modes
What’s included:
For power users
Get Power
Conversation Modes
What’s included:
Research Symphony, bring-your-own-keys, dedicated AI provider workspaces, single-invoice managed allocation, maximum-context models, team seats with role-based access, a 99.5% uptime SLA, and direct founder support, tailored to your organization.
Every plan runs a customizable selection of models, grouped into AI Teams you can manually select for your every question/prompt, or let Auto Team Selector choose the best team for the current prompt.
With Full Control toggled on, your selected team stays active across every turn, until you switch it off.
Pick a plan tab and explore: open any dropdown to see everything it can run. The highlighted option is the default.
New models reach your teams within days of release
The moment a provider ships something new – a GPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, or Perplexity model – we add it to the right team, usually within a few days of it hitting the API and never more than a week later.
Every team stays current, from the flagships down to the fast models, so you are always running the latest, not last month’s.
3 teams · all 5 providers. Flagship A-team included.
Deep deliberation for strategic decisions, novel problems, and high-stakes calls.
The A-team is available on Pro and above.
The workhorse team. Real tasks that don’t need maximum brainpower at maximum cost.
Speed and large context for parsing, structured extraction, and data work.
Deep deliberation for strategic decisions, novel problems, and high-stakes calls.
The workhorse team. Real tasks that don’t need maximum brainpower at maximum cost.
Speed and large context for parsing, structured extraction, and data work.
Deep deliberation for strategic decisions, novel problems, and high-stakes calls.
The workhorse team. Real tasks that don’t need maximum brainpower at maximum cost.
Speed and large context for parsing, structured extraction, and data work.
Deep deliberation for strategic decisions, novel problems, and high-stakes calls.
The workhorse team. Real tasks that don’t need maximum brainpower at maximum cost.
Speed and large context for parsing, structured extraction, and data work.
Deep deliberation for strategic decisions, novel problems, and high-stakes calls.
The workhorse team. Real tasks that don’t need maximum brainpower at maximum cost.
Speed and large context for parsing, structured extraction, and data work.
Current as of September 2026 · models update automatically as providers ship new generations, so your plan always gets the current one. You can reconfigure any team yourself in Settings.
Why this is the best AI subscription
Most people comparing AI subscription plans are choosing between ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, and Perplexity. Suprmind is the option where you stop choosing. Pro at $45 a month runs all five frontier providers in one conversation. The price difference is real, but it is the smaller half of the story. The larger half is what five models do to each other’s answers when they share a thread.
Five separate AI subscriptions
five tabs, zero shared contextUS monthly list prices, September 2026, before tax. Each model answers alone. You copy, paste, and reconcile by hand. Nothing checks anything.
Suprmind Pro
one thread, five models, shared contextSpark at $19 runs four providers with Sequential and Super Mind, which is still less than one single-AI plan.
Saving about $65 a month is the reason people arrive. These four are the reasons they stay.
A single AI cannot tell you when it is wrong. It has no second opinion. In a Suprmind thread, Claude reads what GPT just claimed before it answers, and Perplexity brings sources both of them have to reconcile with. When a number, a date, or a citation does not hold up, one of the other four says so in the same thread. That is the practical form of hallucination mitigation, and it is why our hallucination benchmarks page exists.
Example from a real diligence thread: GPT leaned yes on an acquisition. Claude flagged that 38% net revenue retention contradicted the thesis. Perplexity pulled two comparable deals that underperformed. Gemini revised. One tool, one tab, no manual cross-checking.
Five separate subscriptions give you five first drafts. Sequential mode gives you one draft and four rounds of review. Each model sees every response before its own, so the fifth answer is built on four layers of reasoning rather than starting from zero. Ask the same question in five tabs and you get five versions of the same opening move.
Research on model ensembles points the same way: an ensemble of 12 language models matched 925 human forecasters, and orchestrated multi-model setups have cut error amplification from 17.2x to 4.4x in Google Research testing.
When four models agree and one dissents, most tools would hide the dissent. Suprmind surfaces it. The Disagreement/Correction Index (DCI) drops a card under the message the moment models diverge. The Adjudicator turns that divergence into a decision brief with a recommendation and a confidence assessment. You see where the models split and why, then you decide.
Our Multi-Model Divergence Index is built from 1,321 real production turns. Contradiction and correction between frontier models is routine on finance, legal, and technical questions. A single-model subscription never shows you that it happened.
Five tabs means five memories. Nothing you told Claude reaches GPT. In Suprmind, every model reads the same uploaded PDF from the same passages, Scribe captures decisions and risks as the thread runs, and the Master Document Generator turns the whole conversation into a memo, brief, or report in two clicks. The deliverable is the point. The chat is how you get there.
Switch modes without losing context: Red Team a plan, Debate the two biggest risks, then export the executive brief. Same thread, same project memory.
This is why Suprmind reads as the best AI subscription for people whose work ends in a decision or a document. If your work is casual chat, image generation, or a single model you already love, a single-AI plan is fine and cheaper by nothing. If your work has to survive a client, a partner, or a board, five models checking each other is the difference that matters.
“5 AIs were a go-to resource in setting up our new business venture in NYC. From red teaming the initial idea (with harsh feedback), studio market and competitors analysis, to day to day brainstorming about launch phases and website setup. Being able to bounce any idea off 5 AIs, get a clear filtered answer and a todo list in 10 minutes helps a lot.”
CEO, OFF Studio NYC & Funduck Production
“I started using it for competitor research and it just kept expanding – new markets, risk reviews, compliance docs. Five different angles on the same question catches things I would have missed.”
CEO & Co-founder, Miss Amara
“We run everything through Suprmind now – new business ideas, client contracts, marketing strategies. Having five AIs push back on each other in one thread replaced hours of second-guessing between tools.”
Co-founder & COO, Global Digital Marketing Agency
“For analyzing business plans and evaluating client processes, the depth you get from five models reading each other is genuinely different. The Master Document export with custom prompt alone saves me hours on final reports.”
Senior International Adviser, EBRD – European Bank for Reconstruction and Development
Use Cases
Every output is a real document you can export, sign, and send.
Strategy Consultants
Walk into the partner meeting with five frontier AIs already disagreeing on your behalf. Each fabrication caught before slides leave your laptop.
Verdict
Do not acquire at $42M. Revisit at $26M with NRR turnaround proof.
Founders & Operators
Run a $79 vs $149 split through Debate mode. Watch Claude argue retention, Grok argue elasticity, Perplexity ground both in 2026 benchmarks.
Retention curve flattens past $99. The $50 of headroom buys you Frontier-buyer signaling.
Elasticity at this stage is brutal. You’ll lose 31% of conversions for ~22% revenue lift.
2026 SaaS prosumer benchmarks: 38% of $99+ tools see >40% trial-to-paid lift after price reduction.
AI Power Users
Cancel ChatGPT Plus, Claude Pro, Perplexity Pro, Google AI Pro, SuperGrok. One conversation. Five models. Shared context. Frontier at $95/mo, all in, against about $110 for the five separately.
Suprmind Frontier
All five models · one thread · shared context
$95
Investment Analysts
Five knowledge bases reference the same question. Build the strongest case for and against before capital gets committed.
See exactly what you get with each AI subscription
Usage limits: Every AI subscription plan includes a monthly usage allowance rather than a message cap. When you approach your usage limit, Suprmind does not stop you mid-thought. Around 80% you get a heads-up. Around 90% it switches you to the Daily Drivers team so you keep working, tells you what changed, and offers a one-click Usage Booster to bring the heavier teams back. No hard walls. Learn more about fair use.
The table above shows what each plan includes. This is the shorter answer: who each plan is built for, in the words people actually search with. Every plan is an all-in-one AI subscription. The difference is how many models, which modes, and how much monthly usage.
You pay with your own card. You want more than one model but not a procurement process.
Spark runs GPT, Claude, Gemini, and Grok in one thread with Sequential and Super Mind, Scribe, eight Master Document templates, and project memory. It costs less than a single ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro plan. Subscribe during the 7-day trial and the account is upgraded to Spark Enhanced permanently, which adds the Adjudicator, eight projects, and 12 templates.
You are already paying for two or more AI tools and doing the reconciliation yourself.
Pro is where the math flips. Five providers, three AI Teams, Debate, Red Team, First Principles, and the full Decision Intelligence layer for $45. Two single-AI subscriptions cost about the same and never talk to each other. Pro is also the first plan with the Document Intelligence Pipeline, so a 200-page upload is read the same way by all five models.
Consultants, analysts, founders, advisers. Several deliverables a month that someone else will scrutinize.
Frontier adds Master Project for cross-workspace intelligence, the priority response queue, early access, and priority support, plus the higher monthly usage that heavy Sequential and Red Team work needs. Adjutant and True North arrive here first. It is the plan most professionals land on, which is why it carries the Most Popular tag.
You run the platform for hours a day, or you already hold your own API keys.
Power has the highest monthly usage of any self-serve plan, unlimited projects, 100 files per project at 15 MB each, a direct support channel with same-day response, and BYOK so you can route through your own provider keys. Everything from Frontier is included.
Several people, shared projects, one invoice, someone in procurement.
Enterprise adds Research Symphony, team seats with Read, Write, and Admin permissions, dedicated AI provider workspaces, managed allocation on a single invoice, maximum-context models, a 99.5% uptime SLA, and DPA, MSA, and security review on request. Pricing is sized to your team’s workload during a discovery call rather than pulled from a fixed list.
Still comparing AI subscriptions across providers? The per-provider pages cover what each one costs on its own: ChatGPT pricing, Claude pricing, Gemini pricing, Grok pricing, and Perplexity pricing. Upgrades take effect immediately with prorated billing, downgrades apply next cycle, and there are no contracts on any self-serve plan.
Different decisions need different pressure. Switch modes mid-conversation without losing context.
AIs respond one after another. Each reads everything before it. The default and the deepest.
Best for:
Complex analysis, research, architecture decisions
All five respond simultaneously. A sixth AI synthesizes one unified answer with consensus and divergence mapped.
Best for:
Quick decisions, fact verification, time-sensitive calls
AIs argue assigned positions in sequence. Rebuttals and counter-arguments. Minority views preserved.
Best for:
Strategy validation, thesis stress-testing
AIs attack your plan from six angles in sequence: financial, technical, reputational, regulatory, operational, edge cases.
Best for:
Pre-launch validation, risk assessment, investment pre-mortems
Strips a question to its fundamentals. Each model names its assumptions, identifies the underlying axioms, then rebuilds the analysis from the ground up.
Best for:
Highest-stakes decisions where convention is suspect
Automated research pipeline that retrieves sources, analyses, fact-checks, challenges, and synthesises. Produces 10,000+ word reports with citations.
Best for:
Deep research, comprehensive reports
Sequential, Debate, Red Team, and First Principles all use sequential orchestration – each AI builds on what came before. Super Mind mode runs in parallel with a synthesis layer. Chain any combination mid-conversation.
Pro, Frontier, Power, and Enterprise run all five frontier providers: OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, xAI, and Perplexity. Spark runs four (no Perplexity), with cost-efficient models. Each plan organizes its models into named teams you pick from per question. See the exact models each plan runs → We update them automatically as providers ship new generations, so you always get the current model, and you can reconfigure any team yourself.
Sequential chains AI responses so each builds on previous ones. Super Mind runs all models in parallel and synthesizes a unified response. Debate creates structured argumentation between models. Red Team stress-tests ideas from multiple attack angles. First Principles forces each AI to challenge foundational assumptions before answering. Research Symphony is a five-stage pipeline with specialized AI roles, available only on Enterprise. @Mention orchestration lets you direct specific questions to specific AIs in the same message.
Suprmind doesn’t just chain five AIs together. It runs three layers of cross-AI verification on top of every conversation. The Disagreement/Correction Index (DCI) tracks where the AIs disagree or correct each other in real time. The Adjudicator synthesizes a structured decision brief from the full conversation. The Decision Validation Engine (DVE) is a 6-stage pipeline that pressure-tests high-stakes decisions and issues GO/NO-GO verdicts. Together, they’re how we deliver “disagreement is the feature” in practice.
Standard AI chat breaks down on long documents because each model has different context limits. Our pipeline pre-processes uploaded files into a shared, queryable knowledge layer that all five AIs reference the same way. Drop in a 200-page PDF once. Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok, and Perplexity all answer from the exact same passages, with citations. Available on Pro and above.
Enterprise pricing has two components on a single invoice: a platform fee per Authorized User seat (billed annually, with volume discounts for larger deployments) and a managed AI allocation sized to your team’s workload. We size the allocation during the discovery call rather than offering a fixed price tier – token consumption varies dramatically across team workflows, and we’d rather get the size right than guess from a price list. Learn more about Enterprise pricing.
FastSpring is Suprmind’s merchant of record. They handle payment processing and tax obligations across jurisdictions while Suprmind delivers the Service under your contract. This arrangement has operated cleanly for our parent company since 2017 and offers practical benefits: automatic VAT and sales tax handling, support for tax exemption documentation, and simpler procurement integration. Your contractual relationship for the Service is governed by your Master Service Agreement with Suprmind, regardless of who issues the invoice.
Yes. Upgrades take effect immediately with prorated billing. Downgrades apply at your next billing cycle. No long-term contracts required on any plan.
Admins invite team members and assign them to specific projects. Project-level permissions cover Read, Write, and Admin access. Team-level roles cover Member, Admin, and Owner. Write access allows full chat participation and content creation. Read-only access lets stakeholders view conversations and generate documents without sending messages.
Yes – start with a 7-day free trial on the Spark subscription plan, no credit card required. After the trial, Spark is $19 per month for essential features. Enterprise customers can request a personalized demo with full feature access.
Separate subscriptions give you five models that never see each other’s work. An all-in-one AI subscription like Suprmind puts the same five models in one thread where each reads the previous answers, flags contradictions, and builds on what came before. For casual use, a single-AI plan is enough. For work that ends in a decision or a document, the cross-checking is the part you are paying for, and Pro at $45 costs less than three single-AI plans.
Spark at $19 per month. It runs GPT, Claude, Gemini, and Grok in one conversation with Sequential and Super Mind, Scribe, project memory, and eight Master Document templates. That is four providers for less than the price of one ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro plan. Start with the 7-day free trial, no card required, and subscribe during the trial to keep Spark Enhanced permanently.
Measured per frontier model, Suprmind Pro is the lowest cost we know of: five providers, six orchestration modes, and the Decision Intelligence layer for $45 a month, against about $110 for the equivalent five single-AI plans at current US list prices. Measured per decision, the value is in what a single model cannot do: catch its own hallucinations, preserve disagreement, and produce one exportable brief from one shared context.
Yes. Enterprise is the team plan: seats with project-level Read, Write, and Admin permissions, centralized billing on one invoice, managed AI allocation sized to your workload, Research Symphony, a 99.5% uptime SLA, and security review on request. See Enterprise →
