Investment Decisions with AI-Powered Devil’s Advocacy
Run investment theses through 5 AI models. Debate mode pits bull vs bear cases. Red Team finds deal-breakers. Export investment memos with full audit trails.
Investment Decisions Need Stress-Testing, Not Confirmation
Ask one AI “Should I invest in X?” and you’ll get a confident yes or no – often based on incomplete analysis of risks you didn’t think to ask about. The deals that blow up are the ones where everyone agreed too easily.
Three Modes Built for Investment Rigor
Every output documents disagreements. You see where models align (higher confidence) and where they diverge (investigation needed).
Debate Mode
- Bull case (GPT-5.2): Best arguments for the investment
- Bear case (Claude): Strongest counterarguments
- Cross-examination: Each position challenged
- Synthesis: Where cases diverge, with explicit uncertainty
Research Symphony
- Current market data and news
- Comparable analysis
- Risk factor identification
- Investment memo with sourced claims
Red Team Mode
- Market risk vectors
- Execution risk vectors
- Competition risk vectors
- Regulatory risk vectors
VC Associate Screening Series B Opportunity
Query: “Debate: Should we invest $15M in [Fintech Company] at $120M post-money?”
Bull Case (GPT-5.2)
“Strong unit economics. Net revenue retention 140%. Category growth 47% CAGR. Management team has prior exits.”
Bear Case (Claude)
“Regulatory headwinds in core market. Two board members resigned in Q3. Competitor just raised $80M and undercut pricing.”
Cross-Examination
GPT challenged on competitive moat – response relies on switching costs that may not materialize. Claude challenged on regulatory timeline – concedes impact may be 18+ months out.
Synthesis
Investment thesis depends on regulatory timing assumption. If 18+ month runway, risk-adjusted return is favorable. If regulation accelerates, thesis fails.
Result
Not yes/no. A clear articulation of what must be true for the investment to work, and what kills it. Due diligence with explicit assumptions, not false confidence.
Best Modes for Investment Decisions
| Mode | Application |
|---|---|
| Debate | Bull vs bear investment thesis validation |
| Research Symphony | Comprehensive due diligence with staged validation |
| Red Team | Finding deal-breakers before term sheet |
Deliverable Types
Export professional investment documents directly from your analysis sessions.
Investment Memos
Thesis with documented assumptions
Due Diligence Reports
Comprehensive analysis with sources
Risk Assessment Matrices
Prioritized risks with confidence levels
Portfolio Review Briefs
Position analysis and recommendations
Explore More Use Cases
Validate an Investment
Bull vs bear debate. Documented assumptions. Investment analysis with explicit uncertainty.